2 edition of **Research in interactive theorem proving at Edinburgh University.** found in the catalog.

Research in interactive theorem proving at Edinburgh University.

R. M. Burstall

- 399 Want to read
- 40 Currently reading

Published
**1986** by University of Edinburgh, Laboratory for Foundations of Computer Science in Edinburgh .

Written in English

**Edition Notes**

Series | LFCS report series -- ECS-LFCS-86-12 |

Contributions | University of Edinburgh. Laboratory for Foundations of Computer Science. |

The Physical Object | |
---|---|

Pagination | 7p. |

ID Numbers | |

Open Library | OL13934638M |

You might also like

Liberty and Equality 1920-1994 (Handlin, Oscar//Liberty in America, 1600 to the Present)

Liberty and Equality 1920-1994 (Handlin, Oscar//Liberty in America, 1600 to the Present)

Security of the sea lanes of Asia

Security of the sea lanes of Asia

The Royal George, 1819-1904

The Royal George, 1819-1904

survey of symbolic logic.

survey of symbolic logic.

Pathways to college access.

Pathways to college access.

Marriage Relig & Society

Marriage Relig & Society

Sports and Pastimes (World of Shakespeare)

Sports and Pastimes (World of Shakespeare)

50 years of hockey, 1917-1967

50 years of hockey, 1917-1967

Fire service statistics

Fire service statistics

Field crops production in Florida, 1925-1974

Field crops production in Florida, 1925-1974

Taste

Taste

An extension to the Edinburgh LCF interactive theorem-proving system is described which provides new ways of constructing theories, drawing upon ideas from the.

Interactive Theorem Proving First International Conference, ITPEdinburgh, UK, JulyProceedings. Book Title Interactive Theorem Proving Book Subtitle 9th International Conference, ITPHeld as Part of the Federated Logic Conference, FloCOxford.

ITP is the eighth conference on Interactive Theorem Proving and related topics, ranging from theoretical foundations to implementation aspects and. Introduction. This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the Second International Conference on Interactive Theorem proving, ITPheld in Berg en Dal.

Introduction. This book constitutes the thoroughly refereed proceedings of the Third International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving, ITPheld in. Introduction. This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving, ITPheld in Brasilia, Brazil.

The inaugural meeting of ITP was held during 1114 July in Edinburgh, Scotland, as part of the Federated Logic Conference (FLoC, 921 July ). ITP is the. We present an outline of the principal features of an on-line interactive theorem-proving program, and a brief account of the results of some experiments with it.

This. Description. The HOL system is a higher order logic Research in interactive theorem proving at Edinburgh University. book proving system implemented at Edinburgh University, Cambridge University and INRIA. Its many. History of Interactive Theorem Proving 3 Figure 1: Proof-checking project for Morses Set Theory matic theorem proving programs to interactive.

Edinburgh Research Explorer Visualising First-Order Proof Search Citation for published version: Steel, GVisualising First-Order Proof Search. in. Interactive theorem proving: second international conference, ITPBerg en Dal, The Netherlands,proceedings. Rippling is a heuristic used to guide rewriting and is typically used for inductive theorem proving.

We introduce a method to support case-analysis within rippling. This book is concerned with techniques for formal theorem-proving, with particular reference to Cambridge LCF (Logic for Computable Functions).

Cambridge LCF is a. We propose to create a new model for interactive, machine-based theorem proving that integrates collaboration as a core concept. For this, we shall take the. This volume constitutes the proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Theorem Proving in Higher Order Logics (TPHOLs ) held 36 September in.

However, those proof tasks that need hand -or interactive- intervention present a barrier to the use of formal methods.

Theorem proving was one of the earliest. Interactive Theorem Proving, CSLenttermSec. 0 11 (b) Administrative Issues Address: Dr. Setzer Dept. of Computer Science University of Wales. A list of AIAI academic staff. Member. Interests.

Jacques Fleuriot. Director of Institute. My main field of research lies in AI Modelling, which spans areas such as. When proving a theorem, one makes intermediate claims, leaving parts temporarily unspecified. These open parts may be proofs but also terms.

In interactive. Theorem Proving for Verification -- the Early Days An informal history of the first 10 years of the Boyer-Moore theorem prover, delivered as a keynote talk at FLoC. We use interactive theorem proving to reason about concurrent systems and models of concurrency.

We are especially interested in the theory of process calculi. Lawrence Paulson, University of Cambridge, Computer Laboratory, Faculty Member. Studies Logic, Informatics, and Computational Logic. My research concerns automated. Looking for an inspection copy. This title is not currently available for inspection.

However, if you are interested in the title for your course we can consider. JOHN REPPY, University of Chicago, USA Shepherd: Kim Bruce, Pomona College, USA The ML family of strict functional languages, which includes F, OCaml, and Standard.

Find many great new used options and get the best deals for Interactive Theorem Proving: First International Conference, ITPEdinburgh, UK, July. Abstract. The practical utility of interactive, user-guided, theorem proving depends on the design of good interaction environments, the study of which should.

This volume constitutes the proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Theorem Proving in Higher Order Logics (TPHOLs ) held 3;6 September in. The book Program logics for certified compilers (Cambridge University Press) Interactive theorem proving PhD thesis, School of Informatics.

In the s, as a postdoctoral researcher at Edinburgh University, Mike Gordon was part of the team that built Edinburgh LCF. This was an interactive theorem. University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland. Education ceedings of ITP 5th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving, (G.

Klein. A formally verified proof of the Central Limit Theorem with Johannes Hölzl and Luke Serafin. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 59(4), Paper: doi, online. Many inductive theorem provers generate induction schemes from the recursive calls appearing in terminating functions defined recursively in the specification.

This. A consistent foundation for IsabelleHOL. In C. Urban and X. Zhang, editors, Interactive Theorem Proving - 6th International Conference, ITPNanjing, China.

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. LNCS, pp.1st.

Michael John Caldwell "Mike" Gordon Federal Reserve System is a British computer scientist. Interactive proof assistants have been used to check complicated mathematical proofs such as those for the Keplers conjecture and the Feit-Thompson odd order.

Find many great new used options and get the best deals for Lecture Notes in Computer Science Ser. : Theorem Proving in Higher Order Logics: 14th International. Lennart Beringer is an Associate Research Scholar at Princeton University, where he uses interactive proof assistants to develop provably correct compilers.

Journals Books. Advanced Search. Sign in Register. 中文. SCIENCE CHINA Information Sciences a Constructive Proof of Kleenes Theorem.

Research Report .JOHN REPPY,University of Chicago, USA Shepherd: Kim Bruce, Pomona College, USA The ML family of strict functional languages, which includes F#, OCaml, and Standard ML .